Trump and Xi Jingping summit: How are the United States and China redefining their relationship?

Image
As tensions over trade, Taiwan, technology, and global influence intensify, the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping may determine the future balance of power between Washington and Beijing. By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Sulaimani, Iraq | 13 May 2026 — Kurdish Policy Analysis "We don't have permanent allies and we don't have permanent enemies, only our interests are permanent, and we have to follow them." – Henry John Temple. The root of the current Strait of Hormuz tensions is not only about shipping routes or oil prices, but also about the final collapse of the historical US concept towards Beijing. However, the 2025 National Security Strategy, released by the White House in November, says this was a historic mistake because China used the assets it accumulated to strengthen itself and compete with the West, not to become their partner. For many years, the United States alone maintained maritime security; The fifth US ship in Manama, Bahrain, worked only to keep o...

Trump, Kurds, and the Ground War That Never (Quite) Happened: What Really Went Down in March 2026?

 Trump’s Mixed Signals on Kurdish Forces Leave Ground Offensive in Iran Unlaunched


ERBIL, April 6, 2026 – In early March, U.S. President Donald Trump briefly appeared to endorse a Kurdish ground offensive into Iran before quickly ruling it out, leaving Iranian Kurdish groups without the full U.S. backing some had anticipated as the war with Tehran entered its second month.Trump’s contradictory statements came amid intense U.S. and Israeli airstrikes on Iranian territory, including areas in western Iran with large Kurdish populations. Reports indicated the CIA had begun arming some Kurdish factions, while Israeli strikes targeted Iranian border positions, apparently to facilitate potential cross-border movements.On March 5, Trump told Reuters he viewed a possible Kurdish military action positively. “I think it’s wonderful that they want to do that, I’d be all for it,” he said when asked about Iranian Kurdish groups potentially entering the fight against the regime.Just two days later, aboard Air Force One on March 7, Trump reversed course. “We’re very friendly with the Kurds, as you know, but we don’t want to make the war any more complex than it already is. I have ruled that out, I don’t want the Kurds going in,” he told reporters. He added that Washington did not want to see Kurdish fighters “get hurt or killed.”The episode highlighted the delicate position of both Iraqi and Iranian Kurdish actors in the broader conflict that began with U.S.-Israeli strikes on February 28.Phone Calls and Early EnthusiasmTrump spoke by phone with senior Iraqi Kurdish leaders Masoud Barzani and Bafel Talabani in early March to discuss the war and potential next steps. Iraqi Kurds maintain close ties with Iranian Kurdish opposition groups, many of which are based in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.The Coalition of Political Forces of Iranian Kurdistan (CPFIK), formed on February 22 by major parties including the PDKI, PJAK, Komala, PAK and Khabat, had signaled readiness to challenge Tehran. The alliance outlined goals of overthrowing the Islamic Republic and advancing Kurdish self-determination.U.S. and Israeli officials reportedly explored options for Kurdish groups to seize border areas in provinces such as West Azerbaijan and Kermanshah, stretching Iranian forces thin. Israeli strikes in western Iran were linked by sources to these plans.KRG Insists on NeutralityIraqi Kurdish leaders repeatedly stressed that the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) would not allow its territory to be used as a launchpad against Iran.KRG President Nechirvan Barzani told Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi that the region “will not be part of the conflicts” and would remain “a factor of peace.” He emphasized that KRG territory would not become a source of threat to Iran or neighboring countries.Both the KDP and PUK leadership, including Deputy Prime Minister Qubad Talabani, reaffirmed neutrality, denying any role in arming or facilitating cross-border operations. Barzani described protecting the region from being drawn into the war as a top priority.Despite the rhetoric, Iran and pro-Iranian militias in Iraq launched repeated missile and drone attacks on the Kurdistan Region, targeting Erbil International Airport, U.S. facilities and other sites. Kurdish officials reported civilian casualties and infrastructure damage from these retaliatory strikes.Later Claims and Lingering QuestionsIn recent days, Trump has claimed the United States sent weapons intended for Iranian protesters through Kurdish channels, but suggested the Kurds kept them instead of delivering them. He told Fox News: “We sent them a lot of guns. We sent them through the Kurds, and I think the Kurds kept them.”Kurdish sources have not publicly confirmed or denied the allegation. The KRG has continued to reject any direct involvement in the conflict.Analysts say the episode underscores the limits of proxy strategies in the complex regional landscape. Fears of escalation, Turkish sensitivities regarding Kurdish movements, and concerns that a Kurdish offensive could rally Persian nationalist support for Tehran appear to have influenced the U.S. decision to step back.As the war continues with ongoing airstrikes, the “ground war that never (quite) happened” has left Iranian Kurdish groups operating largely on their own while the KRG focuses on shielding its autonomy and population from spillover violence.
Reporting by Pshtiwan Reports  in Sulaimani.
This article draws on public statements and multiple media reports. Some details of intelligence discussions remain unconfirmed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iranian Media Unveils ‘Lord of the Straits’ Animation Amid Hormuz Tensions

Did Japan just send Godzilla to the Strait of Hormuz? As global tensions rise, a viral meme captures the chaos of 2026’s geopolitical crisis.

U.S.–Iran 45 Day Ceasefire Bid Emerges as War Nears Breaking Point