Posts

Showing posts from August, 2026

About the Peshmerga unification: How Can We Have an Army?

Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj How can Kurdish society build a modern army while balancing history, politics, technology, civil authority, and the Peshmerga's legacy? This may appear to be a straightforward institutional question, but it is not. The question of how to create an army in the Kurdistan Region is ultimately a question about political authority, social organization, historical experience, technology, and the relationship between the state and the forces that defend it. At the most basic level, there are two ways of thinking about this problem. We might call them thin theories and deep theories. Thin theory assumes that institutions can be separated from the societies that produce them. Under this approach, armies are broadly comparable institutions that can be constructed according to common models in different places. The assumption is that what works in one environment can, with sufficient administrative effort, be reproduced somewhere else. A similar logic is particularly domina...

Kurdistan After the Coalition

 Kurdistan After the Coalition By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj Last updated: August 31, 2026 What happens to Iraqi Kurdistan after the international coalition leaves Iraq? The answer will reshape the Peshmerga, Baghdad–Erbil relations and the regional security order. Kurdistan After the Coalition The Security Architecture Is Changing  For more than a decade, the Kurdistan Region's security architecture has been built around a powerful external assumption: The international coalition would remain.  That assumption is now disappearing.  The defeat of ISIS's territorial caliphate changed the coalition's mission. The next stage is changing the strategic environment in which the Kurdistan Region operates. The issue is not simply whether foreign troops remain physically inside Iraq.  The deeper question is what happens to the security architecture that developed around them. Who provides intelligence?  Who provides air support?  Who trains the Peshmerga?  Who pro...

Kirkuk: The Strategic Fault Line

Image
  Kirkuk: The Strategic Fault Line By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj Last updated: August 31, 2026 Kirkuk remains Iraq's most dangerous strategic fault line, where Kurdish, Arab and Turkmen politics collide with oil, territory, security and the unfinished promise of Article 140. Kirkuk Is Not a Local Dispute Kirkuk is often described as a disputed city.  That description is technically correct but strategically inadequate.  Kirkuk is not simply a dispute over a provincial boundary, an oil field or the identity of a city. It is where several of Iraq's unresolved questions intersect at the same time: federalism, Kurdish autonomy, Arab and Turkmen political representation, oil ownership, demographic change, constitutional law, military control and the unfinished reconstruction of the Iraqi state. That is why Kirkuk has repeatedly returned to the center of Iraqi politics.  Whenever Baghdad and Erbil reach a temporary agreement, Kirkuk remains unresolved.  Whenever Iraq enters a...

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

The Gulf’s strategic chokepoint crisis | Kurdish Policy Analysis

Kurdistan in the emerging world order: from autonomy to strategic agency | Kurdish Policy Analysis