Who really controls Kurdistan’s gas? The Dana Gas deal, the KRG’s silence and the hidden cost of selling energy to Iraq

Image
By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis      A $2.239 billion arbitration settlement, a contract running until 2049, expanded rights for Pearl Petroleum and a new battle over gas sales to Baghdad are raising uncomfortable questions about who ultimately controls Kurdistan’s most strategic natural resource. The latest dispute over Khor Mor gas is exposing a much deeper problem in the Kurdistan Region’s energy sector: the public still does not appear to have a clear picture of who controls the region’s gas, who is authorized to sell it, and how much of its future value has already been committed to private companies. At the center of the controversy is Pearl Petroleum, the consortium led by Dana Gas and Crescent Petroleum, and a settlement agreement reached with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on August 30, 2017. Kurdistan Parliament member Kawa Sheikh Ali has now sharply criticized that agreement, asking why a government would effectively commit its natural ...

Trump says Iranian funds under U.S. control will pay for future shipping damage


By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis
 

U.S. President Donald Trump declares that any future damage to commercial ships or cargo will be compensated using Iranian assets held under American control, escalating economic pressure on Tehran.

President Donald Trump says future damage to ships or cargo will be compensated using Iranian funds under U.S. control, raising tensions with Tehran.

Trump Says Iranian Funds Under U.S. Control Will Pay for Future Shipping Damage

SULAIMANI, Kurdistan Region of Iraq — U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that any future damage to commercial ships, cargo, or related maritime assets will be compensated using Iranian funds held under U.S. control, signalling a further escalation in Washington's economic campaign against Tehran.

In a statement, Trump declared:

"From this point forth, any and all damages done to Ships, Cargo, or anything related thereto, will be paid for by Iranian Money that the United States has in its possession, and controls."

He added that using the frozen Iranian assets was "the fair and equitable thing to do."

The remarks come amid heightened tensions in the Middle East, where maritime security remains a central concern following repeated threats to commercial shipping and strategic waterways.

Linking Maritime Security to Frozen Iranian Assets

Trump's statement suggests the administration is prepared to use Iranian assets under U.S. jurisdiction as a source of compensation for future maritime losses that Washington attributes to Tehran or its regional partners.

The United States has frozen billions of dollars in Iranian assets over the years through sanctions and legal measures linked to Iran's nuclear programme, terrorism designations, and other disputes. The legal status and permitted use of those assets have long been the subject of international litigation and diplomatic negotiations.

While U.S. courts have previously authorised the use of certain Iranian assets to compensate victims of terrorism, Trump's latest comments indicate a broader political intention to connect maritime incidents directly with those funds.

A Message of Deterrence

Beyond its legal implications, the announcement appears designed as a deterrent.

By warning that Iran could bear the financial cost of any future disruption to international shipping, Washington is signalling that attacks on commercial vessels may carry consequences extending beyond military retaliation.

The statement is particularly significant given the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-fifth of the world's seaborne oil exports pass. Any escalation affecting shipping in the Gulf could have immediate repercussions for global energy markets, insurance costs, and international trade.

Legal and Diplomatic Questions

Trump's declaration is likely to raise complex legal questions.

Any effort to redirect frozen Iranian assets toward compensation for future incidents would likely require a legal basis under U.S. law and could face challenges in domestic and international courts. Tehran has consistently argued that frozen Iranian assets belong to the Iranian people and has opposed their seizure or redistribution.

The announcement may also complicate future diplomatic efforts, particularly if negotiations over sanctions relief or regional security resume.

Geopolitical Analysis

The statement reflects a broader evolution in U.S. strategy toward Iran, where economic instruments increasingly complement military deterrence.

Rather than relying solely on sanctions or naval deployments, Washington appears to be signalling that Iran's overseas assets could become a strategic tool in responding to regional crises.

For Tehran, the remarks reinforce concerns that frozen state assets remain vulnerable to political decisions in Washington. For international shipping companies and insurers, they underscore the continuing volatility surrounding maritime security in the Gulf.

Whether the policy is implemented in practice or remains primarily a political warning, it demonstrates that financial pressure continues to play a central role in the U.S.–Iran confrontation.

Why This Matters

Trump's announcement goes beyond a political statement. It suggests that frozen Iranian assets could become part of Washington's response to future maritime security incidents, linking economic pressure directly to regional deterrence. If pursued, such a policy could further strain U.S.-Iran relations while introducing new legal and diplomatic challenges surrounding the use of sovereign assets.

Sources

  • Statement by U.S. President Donald Trump
  • White House (pending official clarification)

#Trump #Iran #Shipping #StraitOfHormuz #Sanctions #MiddleEast #MaritimeSecurity #OilMarkets #Geopolitics #KurdishPolicyAnalysis


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Trump warns Iran: 'Pickaxe Mountain' nuclear site is next