From the shadows to supreme power: why Iran chose Ahmad Vahidi to lead its confrontation with the United States

Image
By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis Who Is Ahmad Vahidi? The Secretive IRGC Commander now shaping Iran's confrontation with the United States From the founding of the Quds Force to commanding the Revolutionary Guards, Ahmad Vahidi's rise signals a new era in Iran's military-led decision-making. As Tehran braces for a prolonged confrontation with Washington, one of Iran's most secretive and hardline military figures has emerged at the center of power—signaling a dramatic shift in how the Islamic Republic intends to wage its geopolitical struggle. Who is Ahmad Vahidi? Explore the rise of Iran's IRGC commander and how his growing influence could reshape Tehran's strategy toward the United States and the Middle East. For decades, Ahmad Vahidi remained largely behind the scenes, shaping Iran's military doctrine and regional strategy away from the public spotlight. Today, however, he stands at the heart of Iran's national security apparatus, overs...

Women are paying the price for Kurdistan's deepening service crisis


By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis

Years of failing public services, compounded by regional conflict and economic instability, are leaving women across the Kurdistan Region to shoulder the growing burden of daily survival.

Women in the Kurdistan Region are bearing the heaviest burden of water shortages, electricity cuts, rising fuel costs, and deteriorating public services.

Women across the Kurdistan Region are increasingly bearing the consequences of chronic failures in public services as electricity shortages, water scarcity, rising fuel prices, and deteriorating infrastructure continue to disrupt daily life. Long-standing structural problems have been compounded by recent regional conflicts, particularly the war involving Iran, the United States, and Israel, which has intensified pressure on households and public utilities.

Residents interviewed in Sulaimani describe a worsening humanitarian situation marked by unreliable electricity, limited access to clean water, shortages of cooking gas, and deteriorating roads and sanitation systems. Many neighborhoods experience only a few hours of water every several days, forcing families to purchase water while simultaneously paying for both government electricity and private generators.

Women say they shoulder the greatest burden of managing households under these conditions. Besides coping with higher living costs, they spend hours searching for cooking gas, securing water, and adapting to prolonged power cuts during the summer heat.

In neighborhoods such as Hawani and Tanjaro, residents report that inadequate sewage systems, unpaved roads, and persistent dust and pollution have contributed to worsening health conditions. Families say they are increasingly dependent on expensive private services because basic government services remain unreliable.

Interviewees argue that the combination of economic hardship, regional instability, and weak public infrastructure has significantly reduced their quality of life. They call on the Kurdistan Regional Government to prioritize improvements in electricity, water networks, sanitation, and essential municipal services before conditions deteriorate further.

Regional conflict has exposed a deeper vulnerability in the Kurdistan Region: chronic governance failures are turning infrastructure into a national security challenge.

For much of the past two decades, debates about security in the Kurdistan Region have focused on ISIS, Iranian missile strikes, Turkish military operations, or regional power competition. Yet for many ordinary citizens, the greatest threat to daily life is neither an army nor a militia. It is the gradual collapse of the state's ability to provide electricity, water, fuel, sanitation, and other essential public services.

The recent escalation involving Iran, Israel, and the United States has undoubtedly intensified these pressures. Fuel prices have risen, electricity generation has become more uncertain, and cooking gas shortages have become increasingly common. But the conflict did not create Kurdistan's infrastructure crisis. Rather, it exposed structural weaknesses that had accumulated over years of underinvestment, fragmented governance, and economic dependence.

The strategic lesson is straightforward: wars rarely create state fragility from scratch—they reveal vulnerabilities that already exist.

A Crisis Years in the Making

Residents interviewed across neighborhoods in Sulaimani describe an increasingly difficult reality. Water reaches homes only intermittently, national electricity supplies continue to decline, private generators impose significant financial costs, and municipal infrastructure remains inadequate.

These are not temporary inconveniences.

They represent chronic failures in public administration that have persisted through successive governments despite periods of relative stability and substantial oil revenues.

Regional conflict has merely accelerated these existing trends.

When electricity imports become uncertain or fuel prices rise, societies with resilient infrastructure absorb the shock. Societies with fragile public services experience cascading failures across multiple sectors.

That is increasingly what the Kurdistan Region faces today.

Infrastructure Has Become a Security Issue

Security is traditionally measured through military capabilities, intelligence services, and border control.

Increasingly, however, infrastructure resilience deserves equal attention.

Electricity powers hospitals, telecommunications, schools, water treatment plants, and businesses. Water systems support public health. Reliable fuel supplies sustain transportation and emergency services.

When these systems deteriorate simultaneously, the consequences extend well beyond economics.

Infrastructure failures reduce public confidence in institutions, increase social frustration, weaken economic productivity, and amplify political instability.

In this sense, service delivery is no longer simply a governance issue—it has become an essential component of national security.

Women Bear the Greatest Burden

The deterioration of public services does not affect every member of society equally.

Women frequently absorb the hidden costs of infrastructure failures because they remain disproportionately responsible for household management, childcare, food preparation, and family health.

When water becomes unavailable, someone must secure alternative supplies.

When electricity disappears, someone reorganizes household routines.

When cooking gas shortages emerge, someone spends hours searching for fuel.

These additional burdens rarely appear in economic statistics, yet they represent significant unpaid labor imposed by governance failures.

The result is a widening gender gap in both economic opportunity and quality of life.

The Cost of Dual Energy Systems

Perhaps no issue better illustrates Kurdistan's structural inefficiencies than electricity.

Many households effectively pay twice for the same service.

Citizens finance the public electricity network through government mechanisms while simultaneously paying private generator operators to compensate for unreliable supply.

This dual-payment system functions as an unofficial tax on everyday life.

As regional instability increases fuel costs, private generator expenses also rise, placing additional pressure on household budgets that are already strained by delayed salaries and inflation.

The poorest households experience the greatest hardship.

Regional Conflict Magnifies Domestic Weakness

The recent regional conflict has undoubtedly disrupted fuel markets and electricity imports.

But geopolitical shocks become crises only when domestic resilience is insufficient.

Countries with diversified energy systems, modern infrastructure, and emergency planning can absorb temporary disruptions.

Regions already struggling with unreliable electricity, aging water networks, and fragmented service delivery cannot.

The Kurdistan Region therefore faces a double vulnerability.

External instability magnifies internal weaknesses.

This interaction between geopolitics and governance creates risks that neither challenge alone would produce.

Public Services and Political Legitimacy

Infrastructure is more than an economic asset.

It is also a measure of state legitimacy.

Citizens evaluate governments less by constitutional arrangements than by whether water flows from taps, electricity powers homes, roads remain functional, and waste is collected.

Repeated service failures gradually erode confidence in public institutions regardless of broader political achievements.

This dynamic becomes especially dangerous during periods of economic uncertainty and regional conflict.

When governments cannot guarantee basic services, public frustration increasingly shifts from isolated complaints toward broader questions about governance itself.

Human Security Must Become the Priority

For decades, policymakers throughout the Middle East have largely defined security in military terms. Yet human security—access to reliable electricity, clean water, healthcare, sanitation, and affordable energy—may ultimately determine political stability more than conventional defense spending.

Residents interviewed in Sulaimani consistently returned to the same concerns. They were not primarily discussing military strategy. They were asking for reliable electricity. They wanted clean water. They wanted paved roads. They wanted functioning sewage systems. These demands are remarkably modest. Yet meeting them requires long-term institutional reform rather than emergency crisis management.

The Strategic Challenge Ahead

The Kurdistan Region cannot control regional wars or great-power competition.

It can, however, reduce their domestic impact by strengthening institutional resilience.

Priority areas should include:

  • Modernizing electricity generation and distribution.
  • Expanding water infrastructure and storage capacity.
  • Improving municipal services and sanitation.
  • Reducing dependence on costly private generators.
  • Building emergency fuel reserves.
  • Investing in climate-resilient urban infrastructure.

None of these investments eliminate geopolitical risk. They make society better able to withstand it.

Conclusion

The greatest lesson from the current crisis is that infrastructure resilience is strategic resilience.

The wars surrounding the Kurdistan Region will eventually subside, as previous conflicts have done. But unless the structural weaknesses in electricity, water, sanitation, and municipal governance are addressed, each new regional crisis will continue to produce disproportionate domestic hardship.

For many families in the Kurdistan Region, security is not measured by military deployments or diplomatic negotiations. It is measured by whether the lights stay on, clean water reaches their homes, and they can cook a meal without spending hours searching for fuel.

Those are not merely service-delivery challenges. They are tests of governance—and ultimately, of the state's long-term resilience.

Key Takeaways

  • Regional conflict has worsened existing infrastructure and service shortages.
  • Women bear a disproportionate share of the burden of managing households during service disruptions.
  • Water shortages, electricity cuts, and cooking gas scarcity have become routine in several areas of Sulaimani.
  • Rising fuel prices and reliance on private generators are increasing household expenses.
  • Residents are calling for urgent government investment in basic public services and infrastructure.

Why It Matters

The crisis extends beyond infrastructure. Reliable access to electricity, clean water, sanitation, and affordable energy directly affects public health, economic productivity, education, and gender equality. As regional instability persists, improving essential public services may become one of the Kurdistan Region's most pressing governance challenges.

#Kurdistan #KRG #Sulaimani #Iraq #HumanSecurity #Infrastructure #Energy #Governance #MiddleEast #PolicyAnalysis

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Can the stateless Nation of Kurdistan help save the Global Order?