Posts

Showing posts with the label Article 140

After the American Shield: What the US Withdrawal Means for Iraqi Kurdistan and Iraq’s New Security Order

Image
  US withdrawal reshapes Iraq’s security order, exposing Kurdistan to new risks while testing Baghdad’s sovereignty and defence capacity. Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj The United States is preparing to complete the withdrawal of its remaining military forces from Iraq by September 30, closing a 23-year chapter that began with the 2003 invasion and evolved into a long-term counterterrorism partnership. For Baghdad, the departure represents the restoration of sovereignty and the transition toward a bilateral security relationship. For Erbil, however, the same event is being experienced through a fundamentally different security lens. The immediate question is not whether Iraq should possess greater sovereignty, but what happens to the security architecture that has protected the Kurdistan Region while that sovereignty remains contested in practice. The withdrawal therefore exposes a strategic contradiction at the centre of post-ISIS Iraq: Baghdad is gaining greater formal control over national ...

Kirkuk: The Strategic Fault Line

Image
  Kirkuk: The Strategic Fault Line By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj Last updated: August 31, 2026 Kirkuk remains Iraq's most dangerous strategic fault line, where Kurdish, Arab and Turkmen politics collide with oil, territory, security and the unfinished promise of Article 140. Kirkuk Is Not a Local Dispute Kirkuk is often described as a disputed city.  That description is technically correct but strategically inadequate.  Kirkuk is not simply a dispute over a provincial boundary, an oil field or the identity of a city. It is where several of Iraq's unresolved questions intersect at the same time: federalism, Kurdish autonomy, Arab and Turkmen political representation, oil ownership, demographic change, constitutional law, military control and the unfinished reconstruction of the Iraqi state. That is why Kirkuk has repeatedly returned to the center of Iraqi politics.  Whenever Baghdad and Erbil reach a temporary agreement, Kirkuk remains unresolved.  Whenever Iraq enters a...

Why Article 140 remains the key to resolving Kirkuk's disputed status

Image
  By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj / Kurdish Policy Analysis Nearly two decades after Iraq's Constitution mandated a roadmap for Kirkuk's future, Article 140 remains unimplemented, leaving one of the country's most strategic and contested provinces at the center of political conflict. Article 140 remains Iraq's constitutional roadmap for resolving Kirkuk's disputed status, but years of political deadlock have left the process incomplete. A Constitutional Promise Yet to Be Fulfilled Few issues in Iraq have generated as much political debate as the future of Kirkuk. Known for its vast oil reserves and extraordinary ethnic diversity, the province has long been claimed by competing political forces. Kurds describe Kirkuk as the "heart of Kurdistan," many Turkmen regard it as the historic center of Iraq's Turkmen community, while many Arab political parties insist it should remain under Baghdad's administration. To resolve these competing claims peacefully,...

Popular posts from this blog

From Erbil to the World: What Rudaw’s Guinness Record Says About Kurdish Soft Power

The Gulf’s strategic chokepoint crisis | Kurdish Policy Analysis

Iraq’s Minorities Are Not Just a Humanitarian Issue — They Are a Test of the State