Who really controls Kurdistan’s gas? The Dana Gas deal, the KRG’s silence and the hidden cost of selling energy to Iraq

Image
By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis      A $2.239 billion arbitration settlement, a contract running until 2049, expanded rights for Pearl Petroleum and a new battle over gas sales to Baghdad are raising uncomfortable questions about who ultimately controls Kurdistan’s most strategic natural resource. The latest dispute over Khor Mor gas is exposing a much deeper problem in the Kurdistan Region’s energy sector: the public still does not appear to have a clear picture of who controls the region’s gas, who is authorized to sell it, and how much of its future value has already been committed to private companies. At the center of the controversy is Pearl Petroleum, the consortium led by Dana Gas and Crescent Petroleum, and a settlement agreement reached with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on August 30, 2017. Kurdistan Parliament member Kawa Sheikh Ali has now sharply criticized that agreement, asking why a government would effectively commit its natural ...

The Arrests Are Not the Story: Iraq’s Real Corruption Reckoning Has Yet to Begin


By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis  

Iraq’s recent corruption-related arrests may signal something larger than accountability. The real story could be the political, institutional, and power shifts that follow—and they may redefine Iraq’s next phase.

Public attention today is focused on the widespread arrests targeting influential political and parliamentary figures after years of corruption. Many see this as a necessary step to restore the state's credibility and rebuild public trust in its institutions. However, a strategic analysis doesn't stop at the surface of the event, because arrests are usually not the end of a project but its beginning; they are not an end in themselves but a means to pave the way for broader transformations.


If this campaign succeeds in ending the influence of the political class that has been associated with corruption throughout the previous period, the most important question is not who will leave the scene, but rather the nature of the project that will fill the void afterward. This is because reshaping the centers of power within the state often precedes reshaping the state's identity itself.


Hence, it is essential to consider the Prime Minister's upcoming visit to the United States and its significance in this analysis, especially his emphasis on the need to end "state socialism" and its associated implications for the state's philosophy. This is seen as a pivotal moment, potentially marking the transition from dismantling the old regime to establishing a new one based on different economic and political foundations.


Current events suggest that several issues are no longer merely on the table, but have become integral to a project intended to solidify as a long-term strategic choice.


Perhaps the most prominent of these issues is the establishment of a free market economy as Iraq's ultimate economic option. This entails opening the Iraqi market to American and Western companies, reorienting the Iraqi economy to be organically integrated into the global capitalist system, and consequently reshaping the country's economic and political relations.


In this context, the arrest campaign becomes a tool to dismantle centers of influence capable of obstructing this transformation, thus facilitating the passage of major changes with minimal political and social resistance.


Therefore, according to this premise, history may not only record the Prime Minister as the man who arrested corrupt officials, but also as the architect of the transitional phase who oversaw Iraq's shift from one era to another, and from one regional project to a different international one.


Herein lies the paradox that demands our caution and requires careful consideration. While the public views these measures as a rescue plan for the state, they may simultaneously represent a comprehensive repositioning of Iraq within the international system.


The real question then becomes: Who governs Iraq? What strategic project are we heading towards? How will Iraq be reshaped in the coming decades? Will this change be consistent with its deeply rooted heritage—its culture, behavior, and civilization—or will it be sidelined and follow the dictates of the great powers?

#Iraq #Corruption #MiddleEast #Baghdad #Governance #Politics #IraqiPolitics #AntiCorruption #Geopolitics #IraqNews

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Trump warns Iran: 'Pickaxe Mountain' nuclear site is next