About the Peshmerga unification: How Can We Have an Army?

Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj How can Kurdish society build a modern army while balancing history, politics, technology, civil authority, and the Peshmerga's legacy? This may appear to be a straightforward institutional question, but it is not. The question of how to create an army in the Kurdistan Region is ultimately a question about political authority, social organization, historical experience, technology, and the relationship between the state and the forces that defend it. At the most basic level, there are two ways of thinking about this problem. We might call them thin theories and deep theories. Thin theory assumes that institutions can be separated from the societies that produce them. Under this approach, armies are broadly comparable institutions that can be constructed according to common models in different places. The assumption is that what works in one environment can, with sufficient administrative effort, be reproduced somewhere else. A similar logic is particularly domina...
Post a Comment

Kurdish Presidency Dispute Exposes Deep Rift: Power Sharing, Legitimacy, and the KDP–PUK Struggle Inside Iraq’s Political System

 


Kurdish Policy Analysis / SULAIMANI, IRAQ-- As Baghdad’s presidential process stalls, intra-Kurdish rivalry between KDP and PUK highlights competing visions of representation, authority, and Kurdish political unity.

The Iraqi presidency dispute has reignited tensions between the Kurdistan Democratic Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, exposing deep divisions over power-sharing, representation, and Kurdish political strategy in Baghdad and Erbil.

— A renewed dispute over Iraq’s presidential selection process has exposed long-standing political fractures within Kurdish leadership, as rival parties contest not only positions in Baghdad but also the structure of power inside the Kurdistan Region itself.

At the center of the controversy is the ongoing rivalry between the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), both of which claim legitimacy in representing Kurdish interests in Iraq’s federal system.

The dispute has intensified as negotiations over the Iraqi presidency remain stalled, with competing Kurdish factions unable to present a unified position on key nominations and parliamentary procedures in Baghdad.

The KDP, which holds significant influence in the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), is often accused by critics of concentrating decision-making authority within its internal leadership structures and the broader Barzani political network. Its opponents argue this approach limits institutional pluralism within the Kurdish administration.

Critics also say the party has sought to maximize Kurdish representation in Baghdad while resisting similar power-sharing arrangements inside the KRG itself, a tension that has long shaped intra-Kurdish politics.

The PUK, meanwhile, has positioned itself as a counterweight in key federal negotiations, particularly in disputes involving senior Iraqi state positions. It has frequently challenged KDP-led nominations and bargaining strategies, arguing for a more distributed Kurdish representation model.

Beyond institutional competition, the rivalry reflects deeper ideological differences over Kurdish political identity in Iraq—particularly whether Kurdish parties should prioritize integration within Iraqi federal structures or adopt a more confrontational stance toward Baghdad.

Observers note that both parties have, at different times, entered tactical alliances with Iraqi Arab and Shia political blocs when it has served their interests, underscoring the pragmatic and fluid nature of Iraq’s coalition-based political system.

The current impasse highlights how Kurdish political fragmentation continues to shape national-level decision-making in Baghdad, particularly in moments of institutional uncertainty such as the selection of Iraq’s presidency.

While neither party has publicly signaled a breakthrough, the dispute underscores a broader reality: Kurdish unity in federal politics remains conditional, contested, and heavily dependent on internal power balances between Erbil and Sulaymaniyah.

#Iraq #Kurdistan #KDP #PUK #KurdishPolitics #Baghdad #IraqiParliament #MiddleEastPolitics #Erbil #Sulaymaniyah


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gulf’s strategic chokepoint crisis | Kurdish Policy Analysis

Image
  Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Iran face a widening struggle over pipelines, Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab, reshaping Gulf geopolitics and energy security. The Middle East is entering a more dangerous phase of the Iran–Gulf confrontation in which the central strategic issue is no longer simply the exchange of missiles and drones, but the control of the region’s energy and maritime arteries . In the space of days, Saudi Arabia has faced attacks launched from Iraqi territory against its East-West oil pipeline, Qatar has publicly backed Riyadh’s restraint, Iran and the Gulf states are preparing another diplomatic effort in Oman, and Iran-aligned Houthi forces have seized strategically important territory around the Bab al-Mandab Strait. Taken together, these developments reveal an emerging regional contest over whether energy can continue to move through the Gulf and Red Sea despite the wider war. The most consequential development for Iraq and the Gulf is the reported drone a...
Read more

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Image
  By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis The sudden death of one of Washington's most influential Republican hawks removes a powerful congressional advocate for Ukraine, Israel, a hardline Iran policy, and Kurdish aspirations in the Middle East. The death of Senator Lindsey Graham removes one of Washington's strongest advocates for the Kurds, Ukraine, Israel, and a tougher US policy toward Iran. Lindsey Graham's Sudden Death Leaves a Strategic Void in Washington WASHINGTON — Senator Lindsey Graham , one of the Republican Party's most influential foreign policy voices and one of President Donald Trump's closest congressional allies, has died at the age of 71 following a sudden illness, according to a statement released by his office. His unexpected death comes at a particularly volatile moment in American and Middle Eastern politics. Graham had recently traveled to Ukraine, remained deeply involved in congressional debates over Iran and Israel, and was p...
Read more

Kurdistan in the emerging world order: from autonomy to strategic agency | Kurdish Policy Analysis

Image
 Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj Kurdistan must turn geopolitical importance into strategic agency as the global order shifts toward multipolarity, competition and transactional power. The international order is changing, but the most important question is not whether the existing order is “collapsing.” The more consequential question is which institutions, practices and power relationships will replace the assumptions that governed international politics after the Cold War. A recent English School analysis of the emerging world order offers an important framework for understanding this transformation by examining changes in the balance of power, diplomacy, the use of force, great-power management and the global market.  For Kurdistan, this debate is not an abstract argument among international relations scholars. The Kurdistan Region of Iraq has spent three decades developing political autonomy within an international environment shaped by American primacy, European engagement, regional ...
Read more