Abdul El-Sayed defies $60 Million campaign against him, wins Michigan Democratic Senate Primary

Image
  By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis Despite massive spending by outside groups and high-profile endorsements for his opponent, Abdul El-Sayed secured a decisive Democratic Senate primary victory and now heads into a closely watched November showdown. Abdul El-Sayed has scored one of the most closely watched political upsets of the 2026 election cycle, defeating Representative Haley Stevens in Michigan's Democratic Senate primary despite facing more than $60 million in outside spending , much of it from pro-Israel political groups. The victory marks a significant breakthrough for the progressive wing of the Democratic Party and sets up a high-stakes general election contest against Republican Mike Rogers in November. El-Sayed's campaign prevailed even after Stevens received late endorsements from Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and influential national Democrats, including Representative James Clyburn . Those endorsements failed to reverse momentum behind El-S...

Iraq’s Presidency Crisis Explodes: KDP Accuses Parliament of “Fabricating Quorum”

Disputed quorum, Kurdish divisions, and political boycotts expose deep fractures at the heart of Iraq’s power-sharing system

Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj / Kurdish Policy Analysis — Iraq’s latest attempt to elect a president has plunged into legal and political crisis, after the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) openly challenged the legitimacy of a parliamentary session, raising the prospect of a constitutional confrontation that could stall government formation for weeks.

What was expected to be a routine constitutional step quickly unraveled on Saturday, as conflicting attendance figures, factional boycotts, and unresolved Kurdish rivalries combined to derail the process.

Disputed Numbers, Contested Legitimacy

According to Iraq’s parliamentary media office, 223 lawmakers were present—just above the two-thirds threshold required under Article 70 of the constitution to proceed with a presidential vote.

But lawmakers from the KDP rejected those figures outright.

Ikhlas Al-Dulaimi, a KDP parliamentarian, said she conducted a physical headcount inside the chamber and recorded only 185 lawmakers present, far below the required quorum.

“I conveyed my objection to the Speaker… but he insisted on proceeding,” she said.

The discrepancy has transformed what could have been a procedural vote into a legal flashpoint, with the KDP signaling it may escalate the matter to the Federal Supreme Court of Iraq.

A System Under Strain

The standoff highlights deeper structural tensions within Iraq’s post-2003 political system—where key leadership roles are divided along ethnic and sectarian lines.

By long-standing convention, the presidency is allocated to Kurdish parties. But divisions between the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) have once again fractured that arrangement.

Despite last-minute talks at the residence of Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein, Kurdish factions failed to agree on a unified candidate before the session.

The fallout was immediate:

  • The KDP boycotted the vote
  • The State of Law Coalition, led by Nouri al-Maliki, also withheld participation
  • The session’s legitimacy was thrown into question

Candidates Withdraw, Vacuum Deepens

Adding to the instability, key presidential contenders abruptly stepped aside.

Incumbent President Latif Rashid and senior Kurdish figure Aso Fereydoun both withdrew their candidacies, leaving no clear consensus alternative.

Rather than simplifying the race, the withdrawals deepened the vacuum, exposing the absence of a unified Kurdish negotiating position.

KDP: “Kurdish Rights Are Being Bypassed”

For the KDP, the issue is not just procedural—it is existential.

Ashwaq Jaf, a KDP lawmaker, warned that the session itself violated parliamentary rules and Kurdish political norms.

“The presidential candidate must be decided within the Kurdish house,” she said, rejecting what she described as external interference from non-Kurdish blocs.

Her remarks reflect a broader concern within the party: that Iraq’s informal power-sharing system is being reshaped without Kurdish consensus.

The Sudani Factor and Broader Stakes

The presidency is not merely symbolic. Once elected, the president has 15 days to nominate a prime minister—making the current deadlock central to Iraq’s executive power struggle.

KDP officials argue that the push to proceed with the session is tied to efforts to secure another term for Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani.

They warn that accelerating the process without consensus could:

  • deepen political fragmentation
  • trigger legal challenges
  • damage investor confidence and economic stability

A Crisis With No Easy Exit

Abdullah Aliyawayi, an advisor to the prime minister and presidential candidate, acknowledged the severity of the impasse.

“Without prior political agreement, it will be very difficult to return this issue to parliament,” he said.

That assessment underscores a growing reality: Iraq’s institutions are increasingly unable to function without pre-arranged political deals.

What Happens Next?

Parliament now sits in a state of legal ambiguity and political paralysis.

The immediate path forward depends on one critical question:

Can Kurdish factions unify before Iraq’s constitutional process forces a contested—and potentially illegitimate—outcome?

Until then, the presidency remains vacant, the government formation stalled, and Iraq’s fragile political order once again under strain.

#Iraq #Kurdistan #KDP #PUK #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #IraqiPolitics

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Can the stateless Nation of Kurdistan help save the Global Order?