Three Clocks Are Now Ticking Over the Strait of Hormuz

Image
Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj  Three clocks are now ticking over the Strait of Hormuz, and the interaction among them may determine whether the current pressure on Iran can be sustained long enough to produce an acceptable outcome. Three clocks are shaping the Hormuz crisis: energy flows, market resilience, and Washington’s political time. During the Surge in Iraq, policymakers and military planners often spoke about two clocks: the Baghdad clock and the Washington clock. Progress on the ground mattered enormously, but so did whether that progress came quickly enough to preserve political support in the United States. The success of the Surge ultimately put time back on the Washington clock because improvements on the ground began to change the political calculation surrounding the conflict. Something similar is happening now, but with three clocks operating simultaneously around the Strait of Hormuz. The first is the operational clock. It measures how much non-Iranian Gulf oil and LNG c...

U.S. Declares Iran Mission “Nearly Over” — But War Goals Still Unfinished

 


    Washington signals imminent end to military campaign even as Iran retains strike capabilities and negotiations remain uncertain

Sulaimanyah, Iraq 28 March

Kurdish Policy Analysis— The United States is nearing the end of its military mission in Iran, officials say, signaling a potential shift from active conflict to a fragile diplomatic phase despite unresolved strategic objectives and ongoing regional tensions.

U.S. officials indicate that the campaign—launched amid escalating tensions over Iran’s nuclear and military capabilities—has significantly degraded Tehran’s operational strength, including its missile, drone, and naval assets. However, Iran continues to maintain the ability to launch attacks and disrupt key shipping routes, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz, underscoring the incomplete nature of the mission.

The move toward winding down operations comes as Washington intensifies efforts to secure a negotiated end to hostilities. Diplomatic channels, often indirect, remain active, with proposals reportedly including strict limits on Iran’s nuclear program and regional influence. Tehran, however, has shown resistance to key U.S. demands and disputes the existence of formal talks.

Military officials have described the campaign—referred to in some briefings as “Operation Epic Fury”—as progressing faster than expected, pointing to extensive strikes on Iranian infrastructure and military targets. Yet analysts warn that critical objectives, such as eliminating Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and halting proxy activity across the region, remain unmet.

Despite the apparent drawdown, the broader conflict remains volatile. Iran has continued to threaten regional allies and maintain pressure on global energy flows, while U.S. troop deployments in the Middle East signal preparedness for further escalation if negotiations fail.

Experts note that Washington’s push to end the mission may reflect both military calculations and political pressures, including limited public support and concerns over a prolonged regional war. At the same time, uncertainty over a clear post-conflict strategy raises questions about whether the conflict is truly ending—or merely entering a new phase.

#USIran #MiddleEastCrisis #BreakingNews #Geopolitics #WarUpdate #IranConflict #GlobalTensions


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

From Erbil to the World: What Rudaw’s Guinness Record Says About Kurdish Soft Power

The Gulf’s strategic chokepoint crisis | Kurdish Policy Analysis

Iraq’s Minorities Are Not Just a Humanitarian Issue — They Are a Test of the State