Trump and Xi Jingping summit: How are the United States and China redefining their relationship?

Image
As tensions over trade, Taiwan, technology, and global influence intensify, the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping may determine the future balance of power between Washington and Beijing. By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Sulaimani, Iraq | 13 May 2026 — Kurdish Policy Analysis "We don't have permanent allies and we don't have permanent enemies, only our interests are permanent, and we have to follow them." – Henry John Temple. The root of the current Strait of Hormuz tensions is not only about shipping routes or oil prices, but also about the final collapse of the historical US concept towards Beijing. However, the 2025 National Security Strategy, released by the White House in November, says this was a historic mistake because China used the assets it accumulated to strengthen itself and compete with the West, not to become their partner. For many years, the United States alone maintained maritime security; The fifth US ship in Manama, Bahrain, worked only to keep o...
Post a Comment

U.S. Declares Iran Mission “Nearly Over” — But War Goals Still Unfinished

 


    Washington signals imminent end to military campaign even as Iran retains strike capabilities and negotiations remain uncertain

Sulaimanyah, Iraq 28 March

Kurdish Policy Analysis— The United States is nearing the end of its military mission in Iran, officials say, signaling a potential shift from active conflict to a fragile diplomatic phase despite unresolved strategic objectives and ongoing regional tensions.

U.S. officials indicate that the campaign—launched amid escalating tensions over Iran’s nuclear and military capabilities—has significantly degraded Tehran’s operational strength, including its missile, drone, and naval assets. However, Iran continues to maintain the ability to launch attacks and disrupt key shipping routes, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz, underscoring the incomplete nature of the mission.

The move toward winding down operations comes as Washington intensifies efforts to secure a negotiated end to hostilities. Diplomatic channels, often indirect, remain active, with proposals reportedly including strict limits on Iran’s nuclear program and regional influence. Tehran, however, has shown resistance to key U.S. demands and disputes the existence of formal talks.

Military officials have described the campaign—referred to in some briefings as “Operation Epic Fury”—as progressing faster than expected, pointing to extensive strikes on Iranian infrastructure and military targets. Yet analysts warn that critical objectives, such as eliminating Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and halting proxy activity across the region, remain unmet.

Despite the apparent drawdown, the broader conflict remains volatile. Iran has continued to threaten regional allies and maintain pressure on global energy flows, while U.S. troop deployments in the Middle East signal preparedness for further escalation if negotiations fail.

Experts note that Washington’s push to end the mission may reflect both military calculations and political pressures, including limited public support and concerns over a prolonged regional war. At the same time, uncertainty over a clear post-conflict strategy raises questions about whether the conflict is truly ending—or merely entering a new phase.

#USIran #MiddleEastCrisis #BreakingNews #Geopolitics #WarUpdate #IranConflict #GlobalTensions


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog