Trump and Xi Jingping summit: How are the United States and China redefining their relationship?

Image
As tensions over trade, Taiwan, technology, and global influence intensify, the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping may determine the future balance of power between Washington and Beijing. By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Sulaimani, Iraq | 13 May 2026 — Kurdish Policy Analysis "We don't have permanent allies and we don't have permanent enemies, only our interests are permanent, and we have to follow them." – Henry John Temple. The root of the current Strait of Hormuz tensions is not only about shipping routes or oil prices, but also about the final collapse of the historical US concept towards Beijing. However, the 2025 National Security Strategy, released by the White House in November, says this was a historic mistake because China used the assets it accumulated to strengthen itself and compete with the West, not to become their partner. For many years, the United States alone maintained maritime security; The fifth US ship in Manama, Bahrain, worked only to keep o...

“A Quicksand Feeling”: Iraq Caught in Escalating Fallout from Israel–US War on Iran

 


Iraq is being pulled into regional shockwaves from the Israel–US–Iran confrontation, reviving fears of militia activation, political fragmentation, and strategic instability across Baghdad and the Kurdish region.

Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj, Sulaimani, Iraq, April 2026  —Iraq is once again being pulled into the center of a widening regional confrontation, as the escalating Israel–US war dynamics with Iran reverberate across its fragile political and security landscape.

In a recent analysis titled “A Quicksand Feeling: How Iraq has been Roiled by the Israel–US War on Iran,” political analyst Alex Poppe describes Iraq as entering a condition of strategic entrapment, where external conflict generates internal instability faster than the state can contain it.

Iraq as the “Pressure Zone” of Regional Conflict

According to Cole’s framing, Iraq is not a direct battlefield—but a secondary impact zone where:

  • Iranian influence is deeply embedded through aligned militias
  • US forces remain present in advisory and counterterror roles
  • Israeli–Iranian escalation increases pressure on proxy networks

This creates a situation where Iraq absorbs shocks without controlling their origin.

The result is what Poppe describes as a “quicksand-like dynamic”—the more external forces struggle for leverage, the deeper Iraq’s internal instability becomes.

Militia Networks at the Center of Escalation Risk

A key concern is the activation of Iraq’s Iran-aligned armed groups.

These networks:

  • Operate both inside and outside state structures
  • Can respond to regional escalation without Baghdad’s approval
  • Risk drawing Iraq into retaliation cycles involving US and Israeli interests

This creates a structural vulnerability where Iraq’s sovereignty is fragmented across competing armed actors.

Baghdad’s Weakening Control

The Iraqi federal government faces increasing difficulty in maintaining neutrality.

Key constraints include:

  • Limited control over non-state armed groups
  • Political fragmentation inside parliament
  • Dependence on both US security assistance and Iranian political influence

This dual dependency reduces Baghdad’s ability to act as a stabilizing buffer.

Kurdish Region Exposure

Although often viewed as more insulated, the Kurdistan Region is also indirectly exposed:

  • Security coordination with Baghdad becomes more fragile during regional escalation
  • Economic and oil routes are vulnerable to wider instability
  • Political bargaining power declines when Iraq is destabilized externally

In effect, regional war dynamics compress Kurdish strategic space even without direct involvement.

Regional Spillover Logic: Why Iraq Reacts First

Iraq remains structurally sensitive because it sits at the intersection of:

  • Iranian strategic depth
  • US military presence
  • Israeli regional deterrence logic
  • Internal sectarian and political fragmentation

This makes Iraq a transmission zone for external conflict, where escalation elsewhere rapidly produces internal consequences.

Strategic Interpretation

The “quicksand” metaphor captures three structural realities:

1. Iraq cannot fully exit regional rivalries

Even neutrality becomes difficult due to embedded alliances and militias.

2. External escalation multiplies internal fragmentation

Every regional shock strengthens non-state actors relative to the central government.

3. State authority remains reactive, not preventive

Baghdad responds after escalation begins rather than shaping the environment beforehand.

Outlook: Escalation Without Direct War

Three likely trajectories emerge:

Scenario 1: Contained spillover

Iraq absorbs limited militia activity without full-state destabilization.

Scenario 2: Proxy activation cycle

Militias increase attacks on US-linked or Israeli-linked interests regionally.

Scenario 3: Political fragmentation deepens

Baghdad loses further control over security policy as regional war intensifies.

Conclusion

Iraq is not the primary theater of the Israel–US–Iran confrontation—but it is increasingly its most fragile spillover zone.

As Poppe’s analysis suggests, the danger is not a single decisive war, but a slow pull into instability where Iraq becomes trapped in a widening regional conflict it cannot control.

#Iraq #Iran #Israel #USForeignPolicy #MiddleEast #Baghdad #Militias #Geopolitics #JuanCole #RegionalSecurity


Comments

Popular posts from this blog