The Thucydides Trap Returns: Did the Trump–Xi Summit Push the US and China Closer to Conflict or Cooperation?

Image
After years of escalating tensions, tariffs, military rivalry, and technological warfare, the Trump–Xi summit has revived one of geopolitics’ most dangerous questions: can a rising China and a dominant United States avoid the Thucydides Trap—or is confrontation becoming inevitable? By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Sulaimani, Iraq | 13 May 2026 — Kurdish Policy Analysis How are the United States and China redefining their relationship? "We don't have permanent allies and we don't have permanent enemies, only our interests are permanent, and we have to follow them." – Henry John Temple. The root of the current Strait of Hormuz tensions is not only about shipping routes or oil prices, but also about the final collapse of the historical US concept towards Beijing. However, the 2025 National Security Strategy, released by the White House in November, says this was a historic mistake because China used the assets it accumulated to strengthen itself and compete with the West, not to...

Technological Chokepoints: The New Battleground of Global Power

Technological Chokepoints: How to Balance Resilience and Leverage in a Weaponised Economy. From semiconductors to digital infrastructure, control over critical technologies is reshaping economic security and geopolitical leverage.

LONDON, April 22 (Kurdish Policy Analysis) – Control over critical technologies such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence systems, and digital infrastructure is increasingly shaping geopolitical power, as governments seek to balance economic resilience with strategic leverage in a more fragmented global economy.

A report by Tony Blair Institute for Global Change highlights how “technological chokepoints” — areas where supply chains are highly concentrated or dominated by a small number of actors — have become central to economic statecraft.

These chokepoints include advanced semiconductor manufacturing, cloud computing infrastructure, and critical software ecosystems, where a handful of countries and companies maintain disproportionate control over global supply.

The report argues that in what it describes as a “weaponised economy,” states are increasingly willing to use access to technology as a tool of political pressure, mirroring earlier strategies seen in energy markets.

Recent years have seen export controls, sanctions, and investment restrictions reshape global supply chains, particularly in sectors linked to national security. Governments are now prioritising resilience by diversifying suppliers, investing in domestic production, and strengthening alliances with trusted partners.

However, the report warns that efforts to reduce dependency can come at a cost. Building redundant supply chains and domestic capacity requires significant investment and may reduce efficiency, potentially slowing innovation and increasing costs for consumers.

The challenge for policymakers, it says, lies in striking a balance between maintaining access to global markets and protecting against vulnerabilities that could be exploited during geopolitical crises.

The findings come amid heightened tensions between major powers over technology leadership, where competition extends beyond economic rivalry into national security concerns and long-term strategic dominance.

#Technology #Geopolitics #SupplyChains #Semiconductors #AI #GlobalEconomy #DigitalPower

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iranian Media Unveils ‘Lord of the Straits’ Animation Amid Hormuz Tensions

Did Japan just send Godzilla to the Strait of Hormuz? As global tensions rise, a viral meme captures the chaos of 2026’s geopolitical crisis.

U.S.–Iran 45 Day Ceasefire Bid Emerges as War Nears Breaking Point