Who really controls Kurdistan’s gas? The Dana Gas deal, the KRG’s silence and the hidden cost of selling energy to Iraq

Image
By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis      A $2.239 billion arbitration settlement, a contract running until 2049, expanded rights for Pearl Petroleum and a new battle over gas sales to Baghdad are raising uncomfortable questions about who ultimately controls Kurdistan’s most strategic natural resource. The latest dispute over Khor Mor gas is exposing a much deeper problem in the Kurdistan Region’s energy sector: the public still does not appear to have a clear picture of who controls the region’s gas, who is authorized to sell it, and how much of its future value has already been committed to private companies. At the center of the controversy is Pearl Petroleum, the consortium led by Dana Gas and Crescent Petroleum, and a settlement agreement reached with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on August 30, 2017. Kurdistan Parliament member Kawa Sheikh Ali has now sharply criticized that agreement, asking why a government would effectively commit its natural ...

President Trump says he will end all tariffs and sanctions on Iran

 After years of “maximum pressure,” a sudden pivot raises urgent questions: Is Washington preparing to lift sanctions on Iran—or weaponizing the idea to force a deal within 14 days?


By Kurdish Policy Analysis 

April 8, 2026

A dramatic claim circulating online—that Donald Trump is preparing to end all tariffs and sanctions on Iran—is raising urgent questions across diplomatic and economic circles, as Washington and Tehran enter a fragile two-week ceasefire.

While no formal executive order has yet confirmed a full lifting of sanctions, recent statements from Trump suggest that sanctions relief is now on the negotiating table, marking a striking shift from years of “maximum pressure” policy.

 From “Maximum Pressure” to Possible Reset

For years, U.S. policy toward Iran relied on sweeping economic sanctions targeting its oil exports, banking system, and industrial sectors. Those measures were designed to cripple Tehran’s economy and force concessions on its nuclear and regional activities.

Yet in a sudden reversal, Trump said the U.S. would “work closely” with Iran and discuss sanctions relief following the ceasefire agreement.

This comes just days after the same administration threatened massive tariffs and military escalation, underscoring the volatility of the current moment.

 The Timing: A 14-Day Window

The reported shift is unfolding under a two-week ceasefire deadline, brokered to halt escalating conflict and reopen the Strait of Hormuz—a chokepoint for nearly 20% of global oil flows.

Vice President JD Vance has already warned the truce is “fragile,” suggesting that negotiations are far from settled.

Analysts say the idea of lifting sanctions may be less a policy decision—and more a negotiating tool.

“Sanctions are Washington’s strongest leverage. Floating their removal now could be a way to force rapid concessions before day 15,” said a regional analyst familiar with the talks.

 Contradictions Raise Doubts

Despite the viral claim, Trump has simultaneously pursued new economic pressure measures, including threats  of tariffs on countries supporting Iran militarily.

This contradiction—offering relief while escalating pressure—suggests a dual-track strategy:

  • Public diplomacy: Signal openness to peace and economic normalization
  • Coercive leverage: Maintain pressure to extract concessions

 Regional Stakes: Iraq and Kurdistan

For Iraq and the Kurdistan Region, the implications are immediate and high-risk.

If sanctions are lifted:

  • Iranian economic recovery could expand its regional influence
  • Proxy groups may regain funding and operational capacity
  • Trade routes through Iraq could surge—but with political consequences

If talks collapse:

  • The region could face a rapid return to escalation
  • Energy markets—and Kurdish oil exports—could be hit by renewed instability

 Reality Check: Can Sanctions Be Lifted Quickly?

Even if Trump intends to remove sanctions, legal and political barriers remain:

  • Many sanctions are tied to U.S. Congress, not just executive authority
  • International sanctions frameworks involve multiple governments and institutions
  • Any full rollback would likely take months—not days

The Bottom Line

The claim that Trump will “end all tariffs and sanctions on Iran” remains unconfirmed—and likely overstated.

What is real:

  • Sanctions relief is now part of negotiations
  • The U.S. is signaling a willingness to pivot
  • The next 14 days could determine the future of the region

What is uncertain:

  • Whether this is a genuine policy shift
  • Or a high-stakes bluff before a potential return to conflict

#Trump #Iran #Sanctions #MiddleEast #Ceasefire #Geopolitics #Kurdistan #USForeignPolicy #BreakingNews #OilMarkets

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Trump warns Iran: 'Pickaxe Mountain' nuclear site is next