Trump and Xi Jingping summit: How are the United States and China redefining their relationship?

Image
As tensions over trade, Taiwan, technology, and global influence intensify, the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping may determine the future balance of power between Washington and Beijing. By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Sulaimani, Iraq | 13 May 2026 — Kurdish Policy Analysis "We don't have permanent allies and we don't have permanent enemies, only our interests are permanent, and we have to follow them." – Henry John Temple. The root of the current Strait of Hormuz tensions is not only about shipping routes or oil prices, but also about the final collapse of the historical US concept towards Beijing. However, the 2025 National Security Strategy, released by the White House in November, says this was a historic mistake because China used the assets it accumulated to strengthen itself and compete with the West, not to become their partner. For many years, the United States alone maintained maritime security; The fifth US ship in Manama, Bahrain, worked only to keep o...
Post a Comment

Are wars today solving anything—or just making everything worse? modern conflicts may be endless, costly… and pointless.

     Prolonged conflicts may be entrenching instability rather than resolving it



Sulaimanyah, Iraq  — March 28 

Kurdish Policy Analysis

I question whether ongoing wars in the current geopolitical climate are achieving their stated aims, I argue that prolonged conflicts may be entrenching instability rather than resolving it.

In a recent essay published on Kurdish Policy Analysis I examine the broader consequences of modern warfare, suggesting that wars often evolve into protracted stalemates that inflict sustained destruction without delivering decisive political outcomes. Drawing on historical parallels, I note that stalemates can be among the most destructive phases of conflict, marked by continued bombardment, civilian suffering, and limited territorial change.

My commentary highlights a recurring dilemma in military strategy: even when initial objectives are met or early advances are made, conflicts can settle into long, grinding confrontations that test the endurance of societies and their international backers. I argue that such conditions risk normalizing violence while eroding political clarity about what “victory” actually means.

I further point to the ambiguity of war aims in many contemporary conflicts, where governments often articulate broad goals—such as defending order or weakening adversaries—without clearly defined end states. This lack of specificity, I suggest, complicates both military planning and public accountability.

This  also raises concerns about the unintended consequences of intervention, including escalation risks, economic strain, and the possibility that adversaries adapt and become more resilient over time. In some cases, I imply, external support may prolong conflicts rather than shorten them.

While I do not argue for disengagement outright, my analysis underscores the need for clearer strategic objectives and a more rigorous assessment of whether ongoing military actions are improving conditions on the ground or simply perpetuating cycles of violence.

My conclusion reflect a broader debate among policymakers and analysts over the effectiveness of modern warfare in achieving sustainable political outcomes, particularly in conflicts involving major powers or deeply entrenched regional dynamics.

#WarAnalysis #Geopolitics #GlobalConflict #MilitaryStrategy #WorldNews #UkraineWar #MiddleEast #PolicyDebate


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iranian Media Unveils ‘Lord of the Straits’ Animation Amid Hormuz Tensions

     Iran Drops “Lord of the Straits” Animation — A Chilling Signal Over Hormuz Control March 23, 2026 Iranian state-affiliated media outlets have released a stylized animation titled “Lord of the Straits,” centered on the strategic Strait of Hormuz , as tensions in the region continue to escalate. The animation, which has circulated widely on social media, depicts a dramatized narrative emphasizing Iran’s control and influence over the narrow maritime passage, a critical artery for global oil shipments. While the video does not include official military statements, analysts say its messaging aligns with Tehran’s broader strategic signaling amid the ongoing confrontation involving the United States and its allies. The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly a fifth of the world’s oil trade, making any perceived threat to its security a major concern for global energy markets. Recent weeks have seen heightened rhetoric from multiple sides, including warnings over potential di...
Read more

Did Japan just send Godzilla to the Strait of Hormuz? As global tensions rise, a viral meme captures the chaos of 2026’s geopolitical crisis.

Image
       Godzilla escorts an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz in a viral meme capturing the chaos of rising global tensions in 2026 Japan Deploys Legendary Asset to Secure Strait of Hormuz: Godzilla Now on Escort Duty As tensions surge in the Strait of Hormuz —a critical artery for nearly 20% of global oil—an unexpected viral moment has taken over the internet: Japan has “deployed” Godzilla . What started as a joke is now one of the most shared reactions to a rapidly escalating geopolitical crisis in 2026. Why This Matters The Strait of Hormuz handles nearly 20% of global oil Any disruption impacts fuel prices worldwide Escalation could affect Iraq, Kurdistan, and global markets In a move that has stunned military analysts and delighted meme lords everywhere, Japan has apparently answered the call to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz —by sending its most fearsome maritime guardian straight from the silver screen. A now-viral image shows the King of the Mo...
Read more

U.S.–Iran 45 Day Ceasefire Bid Emerges as War Nears Breaking Point

Image
  ANALYSIS — Last-ditch diplomacy tests limits as U.S.–Iran war nears escalation point.  Backchannel diplomacy scrambles for a 45-day pause as threats escalate and the fate of the region hangs on a rapidly closing window. Kurdish Policy Analysis , April 6 (Analysis) — A flurry of high-stakes diplomacy aimed at halting the U.S.–Iran war has emerged as what officials describe as a “last realistic opportunity” to prevent a far wider regional conflict, even as military threats intensify and timelines compress. At the center of the effort is a proposed 45-day ceasefire , structured as a two-phase process: an initial pause in hostilities followed by negotiations toward a permanent settlement . A narrow diplomatic window The urgency reflects a rapidly closing window. U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed a deadline—extended slightly to Tuesday evening— warning of major strikes if Iran fails to meet key demands, including reopening the Strait of Hormuz , a vital artery for glo...
Read more