Who really controls Kurdistan’s gas? The Dana Gas deal, the KRG’s silence and the hidden cost of selling energy to Iraq

Image
By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis      A $2.239 billion arbitration settlement, a contract running until 2049, expanded rights for Pearl Petroleum and a new battle over gas sales to Baghdad are raising uncomfortable questions about who ultimately controls Kurdistan’s most strategic natural resource. The latest dispute over Khor Mor gas is exposing a much deeper problem in the Kurdistan Region’s energy sector: the public still does not appear to have a clear picture of who controls the region’s gas, who is authorized to sell it, and how much of its future value has already been committed to private companies. At the center of the controversy is Pearl Petroleum, the consortium led by Dana Gas and Crescent Petroleum, and a settlement agreement reached with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on August 30, 2017. Kurdistan Parliament member Kawa Sheikh Ali has now sharply criticized that agreement, asking why a government would effectively commit its natural ...

Hormuz Shut Again: Iran Fires on Ships as U.S. Blockade Pushes Crisis to Brink

 


Strait of Hormuz reclosed hours after reopening, threatening global oil flows and fragile ceasefire

Kurdish Policy Analysis / SULAIMANI April 18 — Iran reimposed restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, reversing its brief reopening and escalating tensions with the United States after Washington maintained a blockade on Iranian ports.

Iran’s military said the waterway had returned to “strict management and control,” warning that transit would remain blocked as long as the U.S. blockade continues. The move came hours after renewed friction over enforcement of the ceasefire, which is set to expire mid-next week.

Maritime security monitors reported that Iranian forces fired on vessels attempting to transit the strait. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center said a tanker came under fire and a container ship was struck by a projectile, sustaining damage. Shipping trackers also indicated that multiple vessels, including tankers carrying regional oil supplies, were forced to turn back.

The escalation threatens one of the world’s most critical energy corridors, through which roughly one-fifth of global oil flows, and risks reigniting a broader confrontation involving Iran, Israel, and the United States.

U.S. President Donald Trump said the blockade would remain in place until Tehran agrees to a broader deal, including constraints on its nuclear program. Iranian officials condemned the move as a violation of the ceasefire framework and warned it could collapse ongoing diplomacy.

Meanwhile, mediation efforts led by Pakistan intensified, with officials seeking to organize a new round of talks. However, Iranian representatives signaled reluctance to reenter negotiations under current U.S. pressure.

latest events around the channel

  • Iran re-closes the Strait of Hormuz after briefly reopening it
  • Iranian forces fire on vessels attempting to transit the waterway
  • U.S. maintains blockade of Iranian ports despite ceasefire
  • Shipping disruptions threaten global oil flows and energy markets
  • Pakistan pushes for renewed negotiations as truce deadline nears

CONTEXT

The Strait of Hormuz is a global energy chokepoint linking the Persian Gulf to international markets. Any disruption has immediate implications for oil prices, shipping routes, and global inflation.

Iran has repeatedly used the strait as strategic leverage during crises. Its closure — even partial — can:

  • Disrupt up to 20% of global oil supply
  • Drive sharp spikes in crude prices
  • Increase shipping insurance and risk premiums
  • Trigger military escalation in international waters

The current standoff follows nearly seven weeks of war that began on Feb. 28 and has already damaged regional infrastructure and strained global markets.

ANALYSIS

The rapid reversal — from reopening to renewed closure — highlights a high-stakes leverage battle rather than a breakdown of control.

1. Coercive Strategy on Both Sides

  • U.S.: Uses blockade to pressure Iran economically without direct escalation
  • Iran: Uses Hormuz closure to impose global economic costs and force concessions

This creates a dangerous equilibrium where both sides escalate just below full war.

2. Energy Markets Enter Volatility Phase

Friday’s oil price collapse may reverse sharply. Markets now face:

  • Sudden supply uncertainty
  • Shipping disruptions
  • Elevated geopolitical risk premiums

Expect extreme short-term volatility rather than stable trends.

3. Ceasefire at Risk of Collapse

With the truce expiring soon and incidents at sea already occurring, the risk of miscalculation is rising:

  • Direct naval clashes could escalate quickly
  • Civilian shipping incidents increase political pressure
  • Diplomatic channels are fragile and conditional

4. Negotiation Leverage Intensifies

Iran’s position: no concessions under blockade
U.S. position: no relief without concessions

This deadlock suggests the next phase could be:

  • Either a breakthrough via mediators
  • Or a rapid return to open conflict 

#Iran #Hormuz #Oil #Breaking #Geopolitics #EnergyCrisis #MiddleEast #USA #Shipping

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Trump warns Iran: 'Pickaxe Mountain' nuclear site is next