Who really controls Kurdistan’s gas? The Dana Gas deal, the KRG’s silence and the hidden cost of selling energy to Iraq

Image
By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis      A $2.239 billion arbitration settlement, a contract running until 2049, expanded rights for Pearl Petroleum and a new battle over gas sales to Baghdad are raising uncomfortable questions about who ultimately controls Kurdistan’s most strategic natural resource. The latest dispute over Khor Mor gas is exposing a much deeper problem in the Kurdistan Region’s energy sector: the public still does not appear to have a clear picture of who controls the region’s gas, who is authorized to sell it, and how much of its future value has already been committed to private companies. At the center of the controversy is Pearl Petroleum, the consortium led by Dana Gas and Crescent Petroleum, and a settlement agreement reached with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on August 30, 2017. Kurdistan Parliament member Kawa Sheikh Ali has now sharply criticized that agreement, asking why a government would effectively commit its natural ...

Iran Rejects Emergency Ceasefire Plan, Warns Strait of Hormuz Will “Never” Reopen

Islamabad-brokered proposal collapses as Tehran signals escalation and dismisses U.S. readiness for lasting peace


By Kurdish Policy Analysis

Diplomatic efforts to halt escalating tensions with Iran collapsed on Monday after Tehran rejected an emergency ceasefire framework brokered by Pakistan, raising fears of further instability across the Middle East.

The proposed agreement, informally dubbed the “Islamabad Accord,” was negotiated overnight with mediation led by Pakistan’s military leadership, including contacts involving Asim Munir. The plan outlined a two-phase process: an immediate ceasefire coupled with the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, followed by broader peace negotiations within weeks.

Both United States and Iran were presented with the proposal, according to officials familiar with the matter.

However, Tehran swiftly dismissed the initiative.

A senior Iranian official told Reuters that the country would not agree to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for a temporary ceasefire, adding that Washington lacked the commitment required for a lasting agreement.

In a separate statement, Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) issued a stark warning, saying the waterway would “never return to its former state,” particularly for the United States and Israel.

The remarks were echoed by Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, who warned that the broader region could face severe consequences, stating that conflict could engulf the Middle East.

The rejection marks the latest in a series of failed diplomatic efforts. Previous initiatives—including deadlines issued by Washington and mediation attempts involving regional actors such as Turkey and Egypt—have yielded no progress.

Analysts say the breakdown leaves few immediate pathways to de-escalation, with both sides appearing to harden their positions.

Attention is now turning to signals from Donald Trump, who referenced a specific deadline in public remarks, suggesting that a decisive moment could be approaching.

While it remains unclear whether further diplomatic efforts will be made, officials and observers warn that the current trajectory points toward heightened confrontation, with the strategic Strait of Hormuz at the center of the crisis.

As tensions rise, the risk of broader regional disruption—including to global energy flows—continues to grow.


#Iran #MiddleEast #BreakingNews #Hormuz #Geopolitics #USIran #Pakistan #GlobalSecurity #Crisis #WorldNews


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Trump warns Iran: 'Pickaxe Mountain' nuclear site is next