Abdul El-Sayed defies $60 Million campaign against him, wins Michigan Democratic Senate Primary

Image
  By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis Despite massive spending by outside groups and high-profile endorsements for his opponent, Abdul El-Sayed secured a decisive Democratic Senate primary victory and now heads into a closely watched November showdown. Abdul El-Sayed has scored one of the most closely watched political upsets of the 2026 election cycle, defeating Representative Haley Stevens in Michigan's Democratic Senate primary despite facing more than $60 million in outside spending , much of it from pro-Israel political groups. The victory marks a significant breakthrough for the progressive wing of the Democratic Party and sets up a high-stakes general election contest against Republican Mike Rogers in November. El-Sayed's campaign prevailed even after Stevens received late endorsements from Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and influential national Democrats, including Representative James Clyburn . Those endorsements failed to reverse momentum behind El-S...

Kurdistan Under Fire: The Hidden Cost of Incomplete Sovereignty

 

    Photo of the latest attack on Khor Mor gas field in Chamchamal, Sulaymaniyah, 26 November 2025.

Relentless drone and missile strikes expose structural vulnerabilities in the Kurdistan Region amid escalating regional conflict

Kurdish Policy Analysis- Sulaimaniyah, 1st April 

The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) is facing an intensifying wave of cross-border attacks, raising urgent questions about its political status, security capabilities, and place within the international system.

A recent analysis argues that the ongoing strikes on the region represent a clear case of “asymmetric spillover violence,” where conflicts between state and non-state actors in the broader Middle East are increasingly being fought on Kurdish territory.

Since late February 2026, the region has reportedly endured more than 450 drone and ballistic missile strikes, despite repeated declarations of neutrality by the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG).
Rather than being a participant in regional conflicts, the KRI has positioned itself as a stabilizing actor—yet it continues to bear the consequences of wars it is not part of.

A Region Caught in the Crossfire

The violence reached a new level on March 24, when ballistic missiles struck Peshmerga bases in the Soran district of Erbil province. The attack killed six Peshmerga personnel and injured around 30 others, highlighting the human cost of the escalating crisis.

Overall, more than 20 people have been killed and dozens wounded in the recent wave of attacks, including civilians, security forces, and displaced individuals.

These incidents underscore a troubling reality: the Kurdistan Region has become an accessible battleground for external actors seeking to project power without facing direct consequences.

The Sovereignty Gap

At the heart of the issue lies what analysts describe as a “structural ambiguity.” The Kurdistan Region operates as a federal entity within Iraq—enjoying administrative autonomy but lacking the full sovereign powers necessary to defend itself effectively on the international stage.

This partial sovereignty creates a dangerous gap. While the KRI governs its internal affairs, it does not possess the independent military or diplomatic tools typically available to sovereign states to deter or respond to external aggression.

As a result, it remains vulnerable to repeated violations of its airspace and territory, often without meaningful international response.

A Blind Spot in Global Attention

The analysis also criticizes international media coverage, arguing that substate entities like the Kurdistan Region often fall into a “blind spot” in global reporting.

This lack of attention may inadvertently embolden aggressors, who operate with limited scrutiny or accountability when targeting regions that are neither fully sovereign states nor entirely internal jurisdictions.

Rethinking International Norms

The situation in Kurdistan raises broader questions about how the international system treats regions with partial autonomy. The current framework, the article suggests, fails to provide adequate protection for entities that exist between full independence and centralized state control.

Without new norms or mechanisms to address this gap, regions like the KRI risk remaining exposed to continued instability—despite their efforts to remain neutral and contribute to regional peace.

A Growing Strategic Dilemma

As regional tensions persist, the Kurdistan Region finds itself in a precarious position: politically tied to Baghdad, yet strategically vulnerable to external threats.

The ongoing attacks are not only a security challenge but also a test of the international community’s willingness to recognize and address the unique vulnerabilities of semi-autonomous regions.

For the Kurdistan Region, the stakes are clear—without stronger protections or a redefinition of its status, it may continue to serve as an unintended battlefield in conflicts beyond its control.

#Kurdistan #Iraq #MiddleEast #DroneStrikes #Security #Geopolitics #Peshmerga #Erbil


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Can the stateless Nation of Kurdistan help save the Global Order?