Trump and Xi Jingping summit: How are the United States and China redefining their relationship?

Image
As tensions over trade, Taiwan, technology, and global influence intensify, the meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping may determine the future balance of power between Washington and Beijing. By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Sulaimani, Iraq | 13 May 2026 — Kurdish Policy Analysis "We don't have permanent allies and we don't have permanent enemies, only our interests are permanent, and we have to follow them." – Henry John Temple. The root of the current Strait of Hormuz tensions is not only about shipping routes or oil prices, but also about the final collapse of the historical US concept towards Beijing. However, the 2025 National Security Strategy, released by the White House in November, says this was a historic mistake because China used the assets it accumulated to strengthen itself and compete with the West, not to become their partner. For many years, the United States alone maintained maritime security; The fifth US ship in Manama, Bahrain, worked only to keep o...

Kurdistan Under Fire: The Hidden Cost of Incomplete Sovereignty

 

    Photo of the latest attack on Khor Mor gas field in Chamchamal, Sulaymaniyah, 26 November 2025.

Relentless drone and missile strikes expose structural vulnerabilities in the Kurdistan Region amid escalating regional conflict

Kurdish Policy Analysis- Sulaimaniyah, 1st April 

The Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) is facing an intensifying wave of cross-border attacks, raising urgent questions about its political status, security capabilities, and place within the international system.

A recent analysis argues that the ongoing strikes on the region represent a clear case of “asymmetric spillover violence,” where conflicts between state and non-state actors in the broader Middle East are increasingly being fought on Kurdish territory.

Since late February 2026, the region has reportedly endured more than 450 drone and ballistic missile strikes, despite repeated declarations of neutrality by the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG).
Rather than being a participant in regional conflicts, the KRI has positioned itself as a stabilizing actor—yet it continues to bear the consequences of wars it is not part of.

A Region Caught in the Crossfire

The violence reached a new level on March 24, when ballistic missiles struck Peshmerga bases in the Soran district of Erbil province. The attack killed six Peshmerga personnel and injured around 30 others, highlighting the human cost of the escalating crisis.

Overall, more than 20 people have been killed and dozens wounded in the recent wave of attacks, including civilians, security forces, and displaced individuals.

These incidents underscore a troubling reality: the Kurdistan Region has become an accessible battleground for external actors seeking to project power without facing direct consequences.

The Sovereignty Gap

At the heart of the issue lies what analysts describe as a “structural ambiguity.” The Kurdistan Region operates as a federal entity within Iraq—enjoying administrative autonomy but lacking the full sovereign powers necessary to defend itself effectively on the international stage.

This partial sovereignty creates a dangerous gap. While the KRI governs its internal affairs, it does not possess the independent military or diplomatic tools typically available to sovereign states to deter or respond to external aggression.

As a result, it remains vulnerable to repeated violations of its airspace and territory, often without meaningful international response.

A Blind Spot in Global Attention

The analysis also criticizes international media coverage, arguing that substate entities like the Kurdistan Region often fall into a “blind spot” in global reporting.

This lack of attention may inadvertently embolden aggressors, who operate with limited scrutiny or accountability when targeting regions that are neither fully sovereign states nor entirely internal jurisdictions.

Rethinking International Norms

The situation in Kurdistan raises broader questions about how the international system treats regions with partial autonomy. The current framework, the article suggests, fails to provide adequate protection for entities that exist between full independence and centralized state control.

Without new norms or mechanisms to address this gap, regions like the KRI risk remaining exposed to continued instability—despite their efforts to remain neutral and contribute to regional peace.

A Growing Strategic Dilemma

As regional tensions persist, the Kurdistan Region finds itself in a precarious position: politically tied to Baghdad, yet strategically vulnerable to external threats.

The ongoing attacks are not only a security challenge but also a test of the international community’s willingness to recognize and address the unique vulnerabilities of semi-autonomous regions.

For the Kurdistan Region, the stakes are clear—without stronger protections or a redefinition of its status, it may continue to serve as an unintended battlefield in conflicts beyond its control.

#Kurdistan #Iraq #MiddleEast #DroneStrikes #Security #Geopolitics #Peshmerga #Erbil


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iranian Media Unveils ‘Lord of the Straits’ Animation Amid Hormuz Tensions

Did Japan just send Godzilla to the Strait of Hormuz? As global tensions rise, a viral meme captures the chaos of 2026’s geopolitical crisis.

U.S.–Iran 45 Day Ceasefire Bid Emerges as War Nears Breaking Point