Skip to main content

Who really controls Kurdistan’s gas? The Dana Gas deal, the KRG’s silence and the hidden cost of selling energy to Iraq

Image
By Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj | Kurdish Policy Analysis      A $2.239 billion arbitration settlement, a contract running until 2049, expanded rights for Pearl Petroleum and a new battle over gas sales to Baghdad are raising uncomfortable questions about who ultimately controls Kurdistan’s most strategic natural resource. The latest dispute over Khor Mor gas is exposing a much deeper problem in the Kurdistan Region’s energy sector: the public still does not appear to have a clear picture of who controls the region’s gas, who is authorized to sell it, and how much of its future value has already been committed to private companies. At the center of the controversy is Pearl Petroleum, the consortium led by Dana Gas and Crescent Petroleum, and a settlement agreement reached with the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) on August 30, 2017. Kurdistan Parliament member Kawa Sheikh Ali has now sharply criticized that agreement, asking why a government would effectively commit its natural ...

Inside Iran’s Proposal: Fast Peace, Delayed Core Issues

 

The US president speaks to reporters at Palm Beach nternationa l airport in Florida

Dr. Pshtiwan Faraj , Sulaimani, Iraq, 04 May , 2026  — Iran’s latest pro­posal to the United States calls for issues between the coun­tries to be resolved within 30 days and aims to end the war rather than extend the cease­fire, accord­ing to Iran’s state-linked media.

The deal would also see the end of the US naval block­ade of Ira­nian ports, and the ongo­ing con­flict in Lebanon, accord­ing to the semi-offi­cial Nour News and Tas­nim agen­cies. But nego­ti­ations on Iran’s nuc­lear pro­gramme – the destruc­tion of which has been one of Don­ald Trump’s key goals of the war – would only take place after the ini­tial deal is reached.

Mr Trump on Sat­urday said he was review­ing a new Ira­nian pro­posal but expressed doubt it would lead to a deal, adding on social media that “they have not yet paid a big enough price for what they have done to Human­ity, and the World, over the last 47 years” since the Islamic Revolu­tion there.

Iran’s 14-point pro­posal, a rebut­tal to a US nine-point plan, also calls for the US with­draw­ing forces from the region and ceas­ing all hos­til­it­ies.

There was no men­tion in those reports, however, of Iran’s nuc­lear pro­gram and its enriched uranium, long the cent­ral issue in ten­sions with the US and one that Tehran would rather address later. Iran sent its reply via Pakistan, which hos­ted faceto-face talks last month between Iran and the United States.

Pakistan’s prime min­is­ter, for­eign min­is­ter and army chief con­tinue to push nego­ti­ations and encour­age the US and Iran to speak dir­ectly, accord­ing to two offi­cials in Pakistan who spoke on con­di­tion of anonym­ity because they were not author­ised to speak to the media.

The fra­gile three-week cease­fire appears to be hold­ing, although Mr Trump on Sat­urday told journ­al­ists that fur­ther strikes remained a pos­sib­il­ity.

Also yes­ter­day, Ira­nian for­eign min­is­ter Abbas Aragh­chi spoke with Oman’s for­eign min­is­ter Badr al-Busaidi, who over­saw pre­vi­ous rounds of talks between the US and Iran before the war.

Mr Trump has offered a plan to reopen the Strait of Hor­muz at the mouth of the Per­sian Gulf, where about a fifth of the world’s trade in oil and nat­ural gas typ­ic­ally passes, along with fer­til­iser badly needed by farm­ers around the world.

Iran’s grip on the strait has shaken global mar­kets. Iran’s deputy par­lia­ment speaker yes­ter­day said Tehran “will not back down from our pos­i­tion on the Strait of Hor­muz, and it will not return to its pre­war con­di­tions.” Ali Nikzad, who has no decision­mak­ing power in par­lia­ment, spoke while vis­it­ing port facil­it­ies on stra­tegic Larak Island.

Mr Nikzad reit­er­ated Iran’s pos­i­tion that any ship not asso­ci­ated with the US or Israel can pass after pay­ing a toll. Tehran effect­ively closed the strait by attack­ing and threat­en­ing ships.

The US has warned ship­ping com­pan­ies they could face sanc­tions for pay­ing Iran in any form, includ­ing digital assets, to pass safely. Mean­while, the US naval block­ade since 13 April is depriving Tehran of oil rev­enue it needs to shore up its ail­ing eco­nomy.

Accord­ing to reports in Ira­nian media, sev­eral factor­ies have not renewed con­tracts for work­ers after the Ira­nian new year in March, and sig­ni­fic­ant num­bers have lost their jobs. Yousef Pezeshkian, the son and adviser of Pres­id­ent Masoud Pezeshkian, wrote on Tele­gram that both the United States and Iran see them­selves as the win­ner of the war and are unwill­ing to back down.

#BreakingNews #Iran #USA #Hormuz #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #OilCrisis #NuclearDeal #GlobalSecurity #WarAndPeace


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lindsey Graham Passing Reshapes Republican Foreign Policy—and Raises Questions for the Kurds

Lindsey Graham's Death Leaves a Void in US-Kurdish Relations

Trump warns Iran: 'Pickaxe Mountain' nuclear site is next